Hi Tomas
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Tomáš Šafařík wrote:
> I finally found some free time to build the tuxcmd with fpc_2.2.4-3
> and it works!
That's great! So I will check if I can let rebuild tuxcmd for powerpc!
Kind regards
Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
Hello Salvatore,
I finally found some free time to build the tuxcmd with fpc_2.2.4-3 and
it works!
Thanks for your help!
Tomas
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Tomas
"Hopefully" one last try!
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Tomáš Šafařík wrote:
as I wrote - none of the mentione
Hi Tomas
"Hopefully" one last try!
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Tomáš Šafařík wrote:
> as I wrote - none of the mentioned applications is working on my powerpc
> iBook G4. Lazarus is just metapackage and I tested lazarus-ide which
> contains the binaries.
>
> So I find it still a
Hi Salvatore,
as I wrote - none of the mentioned applications is working on my powerpc
iBook G4. Lazarus is just metapackage and I tested lazarus-ide which
contains the binaries.
So I find it still as not solved.
Regards,
Tomas
On 28.5.2009 10:49, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Tomas
On
Hi Tomas
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:01:40PM +0200, Tomáš Šafařík wrote:
> sorry for my late answer.
No problem!
> I just noticed, that tuxcmd_0.6.50-5 is already in the repository. I
> also checked winff_1.0.1-2 and lazarus-ide_0.9.26.2-1 which uses
> fpc_2.2.4-1 but the problem is still the
Hi Salvatore,
sorry for my late answer.
I just noticed, that tuxcmd_0.6.50-5 is already in the repository. I
also checked winff_1.0.1-2 and lazarus-ide_0.9.26.2-1 which uses
fpc_2.2.4-1 but the problem is still there.
Should I try to compile it?
Tomas
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Tomas
Hi Tomas
It passed now really much time since my last reply. Last days now a
new version of fpc was uploaded (2.2.4-1).
Can you please try, if compilation under powerpc works fine, and then
now you can use tuxcmd? (See http://bugs.debian.org/515035, hope with
the new version this may be solved).
Hi Tomas, hi all others
I got an reply/note from upstream author of tuxcmd (Tomáš Bžatek) on
this issue:
> yes, PowerPC port is currently broken. FreePascal has very bad support for
> different endianity, mostly from the memory management point of view. I had
> partial success some time ago on an
Hi Thomas
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 06:55:49AM +0100, Tomas Safarik wrote:
> Package: tuxcmd
> Version: 0.6.50-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> I installed tuxcmd and running it results in:
>
> $ tuxcmd
[...]
>
> Maybe it is because of powerpc.
>
> I'll provide more information if needed.
Package: tuxcmd
Version: 0.6.50-1
Severity: important
Hello,
I installed tuxcmd and running it results in:
$ tuxcmd
malloc(93): 0x481FB010
free(0x481FB010)
malloc(93): 0x481FB010
free(0x481FB010)
malloc(93): 0x481FB010
free(0x481FB010)
malloc(93): 0x481FB010
free(0x481FB010)
An unhandled excepti
10 matches
Mail list logo
