Matthias> could you test the patch from
Matthias> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg96700.html and follow
Matthias> up with information if that fixes your problem?
It seems to fix it (2 days of fetchmail, no MSG_PEEK warnings yet).
--
Ian Zimmerman
gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD
fingerpr
reassign 513695 linux-2.6 2.6.28-1
forwarded 513695 http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg96676.html
tags 513695 patch
thanks
The cause of these errors has been traced to the kernel. The errors are
bogus and due to a test that's no longer correct after a code change in
2.6.28.
The errors have
Am 01.05.2009, 18:11 Uhr, schrieb Ian Zimmerman :
Me too. I'm fetching IMAP. The remote server is dovecot as in lenny
(i.e. 1:1.0.15-2.3). And it is over an openvpn link (debian openvpn
2.1~rc11-1 on both sides).
This is the first time I see it, and the involved packages have not
been updat
Me too. I'm fetching IMAP. The remote server is dovecot as in lenny
(i.e. 1:1.0.15-2.3). And it is over an openvpn link (debian openvpn
2.1~rc11-1 on both sides).
This is the first time I see it, and the involved packages have not
been updated in a long while, so I may not be able to reproduce
Am 06.03.2009, 00:14 Uhr, schrieb Frans Pop :
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, I wrote:
I have an strace and tcpdump for a fetchmail run that produces the
error. I don't see any URG data in the dump.
The syslog shows (account name removed):
Mar 3 20:38:01 elrond fetchmail[10659]: 3 messages (1 seen)
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, I wrote:
> I have an strace and tcpdump for a fetchmail run that produces the
> error. I don't see any URG data in the dump.
>
> The syslog shows (account name removed):
> Mar 3 20:38:01 elrond fetchmail[10659]: 3 messages (1 seen) for xxx at
> pop.planet.nl (29679 o
On Monday 02 March 2009, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 27.02.2009, 12:03 Uhr, schrieb Frans Pop :
> > On Friday 27 February 2009, you wrote:
> >> > I should be able to catch this in a TCP dump if needed.
> >>
> >> That would be nice, please do so.
> >
> > Would an strace help as well? If so, for what
Am 27.02.2009, 12:03 Uhr, schrieb Frans Pop :
On Friday 27 February 2009, you wrote:
> I should be able to catch this in a TCP dump if needed.
That would be nice, please do so.
Would an strace help as well? If so, for what system calls?
Hi Frans,
please check the tcpdump for "URG"ent data
On Friday 27 February 2009, you wrote:
> > I should be able to catch this in a TCP dump if needed.
>
> That would be nice, please do so.
Would an strace help as well? If so, for what system calls?
Seems logical to do both at the same time so results can be matched.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
* Frans Pop [2009-02-26 23:45]:
[...]
> Feb 26 18:00:02 elrond kernel: TCP(fetchmail:11395): Application bug, race in
> MSG_PEEK.
> Feb 26 18:00:02 elrond kernel: TCP(fetchmail:11395): Application bug, race in
> MSG_PEEK.
> Feb 26 18:20:01 elrond kernel: TCP(fetchmail:12864): Application bu
Just want to add a "me too".
I've upgraded my home server from etch to lenny today and have started
seeing these messages fairly regularly when fetching mail from my provider.
Feb 26 18:00:02 elrond kernel: TCP(fetchmail:11395): Application bug, race in
MSG_PEEK.
Feb 26 18:00:02 elrond kernel: T
Matthias Andree, le Mon 02 Feb 2009 23:37:04 +0100, a écrit :
> Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 23:19 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 14:34:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > > * Samuel Thibault [2009-02-01 14:28]:
> > > > Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0100, a écrit :
Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 23:19 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Hello,
>
> Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 14:34:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > * Samuel Thibault [2009-02-01 14:28]:
> > > Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > Thanks I saw this one when searching for the probl
Hello,
Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 14:34:54 +0100, a écrit :
> * Samuel Thibault [2009-02-01 14:28]:
> > Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Thanks I saw this one when searching for the problem after
> > > receiving the bug report. But it's missing replies ;-P
> >
Am Sonntag, den 01.02.2009, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Matthias Andree, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 16:32:54 +0100, a écrit :
> > Salut Samuel; is there any more information or kernel documentation on
> > the "race in MSG_PEEK"?
>
> Nothing more than the explanation given by Dave Miller in my p
Am Samstag, den 31.01.2009, 14:25 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Package: fetchmail
> Version: 6.3.9~rc2-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> The linux kernel reports
>
> TCP(fetchmail:5006): Application bug, race in MSG_PEEK.
>
> I guess that should be investigated.
>
Salut Samuel; is there
Matthias Andree, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 16:32:54 +0100, a écrit :
> Salut Samuel; is there any more information or kernel documentation on
> the "race in MSG_PEEK"?
Nothing more than the explanation given by Dave Miller in my previous
link.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 14:34:54 +0100, a écrit :
> * Samuel Thibault [2009-02-01 14:28]:
> > Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Thanks I saw this one when searching for the problem after
> > > receiving the bug report. But it's missing replies ;-P
> >
> > I'm
Hi,
* Samuel Thibault [2009-02-01 14:28]:
> Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0100, a écrit :
> > Thanks I saw this one when searching for the problem after
> > receiving the bug report. But it's missing replies ;-P
>
> I'm wondering: maybe the issue is because the _server_ sends some URG
Nico Golde, le Sun 01 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0100, a écrit :
> Thanks I saw this one when searching for the problem after
> receiving the bug report. But it's missing replies ;-P
Heh.
I'm wondering: maybe the issue is because the _server_ sends some URG
data?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Hi,
* Samuel Thibault [2009-02-01 02:29]:
> Nico Golde, le Sat 31 Jan 2009 16:52:32 +0100, a écrit :
> > * Samuel Thibault [2009-01-31 15:11]:
> > > The linux kernel reports
> > >
> > > TCP(fetchmail:5006): Application bug, race in MSG_PEEK.
> > >
> > > I guess that should be investigated.
> >
Nico Golde, le Sat 31 Jan 2009 16:52:32 +0100, a écrit :
> * Samuel Thibault [2009-01-31 15:11]:
> > The linux kernel reports
> >
> > TCP(fetchmail:5006): Application bug, race in MSG_PEEK.
> >
> > I guess that should be investigated.
>
> Just just had a quic look at the fetchmail code and I fa
The answer from David S. Miller:
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2003-09/6009.html
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 513695 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
* Samuel Thibault [2009-01-31 15:11]:
> The linux kernel reports
>
> TCP(fetchmail:5006): Application bug, race in MSG_PEEK.
>
> I guess that should be investigated.
Just just had a quic look at the fetchmail code and I fail
to see the problem. Are there
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.3.9~rc2-4
Severity: normal
Hello,
The linux kernel reports
TCP(fetchmail:5006): Application bug, race in MSG_PEEK.
I guess that should be investigated.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, '
25 matches
Mail list logo
