* Luk Claes [2009-02-07 22:41]:
> Thanks. best thing would be to use a version between 1:3.0.1-6lenny1 and
> 1:3.0.1-6lenny2 though as otherwise for every architecture octave3.0 has
> to be installed with a higher version in unstable before the t-p-u
> version will be considered...
You are right
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-02-07 11:46]:
>
>> * Luk Claes [2009-02-07 04:13]:
>>> Yes, but it depends on pcre3 which has a shlib bump and is not going to
>>> migrate to testing. I guess I should have told that when requesting to
>>> upload to t-p-u...
>> Oh, I see. I
* Rafael Laboissiere [2009-02-07 14:43]:
> * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-02-07 11:46]:
>
> > * Luk Claes [2009-02-07 04:13]:
> > > Yes, but it depends on pcre3 which has a shlib bump and is not going to
> > > migrate to testing. I guess I should have told that when requesting to
> > > upload to t
* Rafael Laboissiere [2009-02-07 11:46]:
> * Luk Claes [2009-02-07 04:13]:
> > Yes, but it depends on pcre3 which has a shlib bump and is not going to
> > migrate to testing. I guess I should have told that when requesting to
> > upload to t-p-u...
>
> Oh, I see. I will upload to t-p-u today.
* Luk Claes [2009-02-07 04:13]:
> Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > * Luk Claes [2009-02-06 19:22]:
> >
> >> Can you please upload a fixed version to testing-proposed-updates, TIA?
> >
> > What about octave3.0 3.0.1-6lenny2 that is now in unstable? The changes in
> > relation to 3.0.1-6lenny1, wh
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Luk Claes [2009-02-06 19:22]:
>
>> Can you please upload a fixed version to testing-proposed-updates, TIA?
>
> What about octave3.0 3.0.1-6lenny2 that is now in unstable? The changes in
> relation to 3.0.1-6lenny1, which is now in testing, is really minimal.
Yes,
* Luk Claes [2009-02-06 19:22]:
> Can you please upload a fixed version to testing-proposed-updates, TIA?
What about octave3.0 3.0.1-6lenny2 that is now in unstable? The changes in
relation to 3.0.1-6lenny1, which is now in testing, is really minimal.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi
Can you please upload a fixed version to testing-proposed-updates, TIA?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
package octave3.0
tags 513576 confirmed
tags 513576 upstream
forwarded 513576
http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-February/010599.html
thanks
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 04:09:06PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I guess octave3 could just provide the
>
> /usr/share/octave/
I guess octave3 could just provide the
/usr/share/octave/packages
directory itself, so that that command never fails.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: octave3.0
Version: 1:3.0.1-6lenny1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software (the package system)
Or Package: octave-symbolic
Version: 1.0.6-2
Not sure if the bug's in octave-symbolic or octave3.0, please
reassign if this is wrong.
octave-symbolic fails to either re
11 matches
Mail list logo
