Bug#512187:

2010-12-01 Thread Thibaut Colar
I have released a new version 0.3.1 which is quite a rewrite. I think this should work better in regard to this issue as well. http://bitbucket.org/tcolar/wmfrog/ -- Thibaut Colar Senior E-Commerce Architect Pacific Coast Feather Co. P: 206.336.2266 F: 206.625.9783 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#512187: wmfrog: uses a polling mechanism that causes 10 wakeups/second

2010-09-05 Thread jari
On 2010-09-03 11:15, Thibaut Colar wrote: | I'm the wfrog author. | | I'll try to have a look at it. | | I wrote that stuff like 10+ years ago and it's not very pretty, and I | almost never write in C/C++, but should be able to workaround that | issue. I'm attaching a piece of C-code that demons

Bug#512187:

2010-09-03 Thread Thibaut Colar
I'm the wfrog author. I'll try to have a look at it. I wrote that stuff like 10+ years ago and it's not very pretty, and I almost never write in C/C++, but should be able to workaround that issue. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Bug#512187: wmfrog: uses a polling mechanism that causes 10 wakeups/second

2009-01-18 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: wmfrog Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: normal Src/wmFrog.c contains the following lines: ... #define DELAY 10L ... int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { ... while(1) { ... usleep(DELAY); } ... This makes wmfrog wake up 10 times per second and thus has a noticeable impact on t