Bug#511357: Sorting wrong for sv_SE

2009-01-12 Thread Tomas Gradin
There is no consensus in Sweden that V and W suddenly became two distinct letters just because the Swedish Academy changed the collation order in their lexicon. Please do not change this just because some people think this is a novelty that should be adopted. Sorting V with W has been the norm

Bug#511357: Sorting wrong for sv_SE

2009-01-10 Thread Clint Adams
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:31:10PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > BTW, I just noticed > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506784 > > That bug is incorrect (though it used to be correct with the old > collation rules for Swedish), and a comment with a reference to this bug > should

Bug#511357: Sorting wrong for sv_SE

2009-01-10 Thread David Weinehall
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:02:26AM +, Clint Adams wrote: > Does this do the right thing for you? Yup! Thanks a million! BTW, I just noticed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506784 That bug is incorrect (though it used to be correct with the old collation rules for Swedish),

Bug#511357: Sorting wrong for sv_SE

2009-01-09 Thread Clint Adams
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:02:04AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > Until 2006, W was regarded as a variant of V, but when the 13th edition > > of SAOL (Svenska Akademiens OrdLista; the reference dictionary for the > > Swedish language) was introduced, W was a proper letter, aft

Bug#511357: Sorting wrong for sv_SE

2009-01-09 Thread David Weinehall
Package: locales Version: 2.7-18 Until 2006, W was regarded as a variant of V, but when th