Bug#511299: [PATCH] support manually started backup actions

2009-01-12 Thread Tuomas Jormola
Uh, just forget the last message, I was referring to checkpidalive() of the locking patch I sent... signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#511299: [PATCH] support manually started backup actions

2009-01-12 Thread Tuomas Jormola
Hi, On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:10:04PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > intrigeri wrote (12 Jan 2009 12:12:37 GMT) : > > BTW, your patch had inverted logics: as documented, the isnow > > function returns 1 on success (weird, sure, but it works...) > > Sorry, your patch was right, my mistake. Yeah, it's

Bug#511299: [PATCH] support manually started backup actions

2009-01-12 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (12 Jan 2009 12:12:37 GMT) : > BTW, your patch had inverted logics: as documented, the isnow > function returns 1 on success (weird, sure, but it works...) Sorry, your patch was right, my mistake. -- intrigeri | gnupg key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intriger

Bug#511299: [PATCH] support manually started backup actions

2009-01-12 Thread intrigeri
tags 511299 + fixed-upstream thanks Hello, Tuomas Jormola wrote (09 Jan 2009 10:42:18 GMT) : > Currently backupninja schedules all the backup action jobs that are > configured in the /etc/backup.d directory. However, I'd like to keep > configuration for some of the hosts under the directory but I

Bug#511299: [PATCH] support manually started backup actions

2009-01-09 Thread Tuomas Jormola
Package: backupninja Version: 0.9.6-4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, Currently backupninja schedules all the backup action jobs that are configured in the /etc/backup.d directory. However, I'd like to keep configuration for some of the hosts under the directory but I would rather not try back