Bug#511047: unionfs-fuse: RO not being respected

2009-01-14 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, 2009/1/8 Bernd Schubert : [...] > > What do you think, would it be possible to add these changes to Lenny? > > > http://podgorny.cz/~bernd/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/radek-trunk-bernd-merge/rev/c18067e6a849 > http://podgorny.cz/~bernd/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/radek-trunk-bernd-merge/rev/c61013290b29 > http://podg

Bug#511047: unionfs-fuse: RO not being respected

2009-01-08 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 22:07:49 Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hello Bernd, > > 2009/1/7 Bernd Schubert : > [...] > > > Hmm, I'm afraid though, this is more a missing feature. Everything I did > > for RO/RW branches I did to properly support copy-on-write. And actually > > I thing > > Then please

Bug#511047: unionfs-fuse: RO not being respected

2009-01-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello Bernd, 2009/1/7 Bernd Schubert : [...] > > Hmm, I'm afraid though, this is more a missing feature. Everything I did for > RO/RW branches I did to properly support copy-on-write. And actually I thing Then please state so in the man page ;) > unionfs-fuse is not much of use without cow. Howe

Bug#511047: unionfs-fuse: RO not being respected

2009-01-07 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hello Raphael, On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:07:08 Raphael Geissert wrote: > Package: unionfs-fuse > Version: 0.21-2 > > Hi, > > Trying out unionfs-fuse to determine whether it is better than funionfs or > not I noticed that even when a directory is marked as RO, it is not I'm very glad you are

Bug#511047: unionfs-fuse: RO not being respected

2009-01-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: unionfs-fuse Version: 0.21-2 Hi, Trying out unionfs-fuse to determine whether it is better than funionfs or not I noticed that even when a directory is marked as RO, it is not respected. Example: $ mkdir -p {{local,remote}/,}test $ /usr/sbin/unionfs-fuse remote/test=RO:local/test=RW t