Florian Weimer wrote:
> * MJ Ray:
>
> > 3. is the licence any obstacle to meeting DFSG?
>
> It doesn't mention the act of running the program or using it.
> Or does this activity fall under "display"?
The licence does mention using it, in "Your use of this software code
is at your own risk ...",
* MJ Ray:
> 3. is the licence any obstacle to meeting DFSG?
It doesn't mention the act of running the program or using it.
Or does this activity fall under "display"?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Please, also see the licence for the file
http://code.google.com/p/s3sync-s3cmd/source/browse/trunk/s3sync/S3.rb
# This software code is made available "AS IS" without warranties of any
# kind. You may copy, display, modify and redistribute the software
# code either by itself or as incorporat
I hope no-one minds, but I'd like some smart analysis of this software's
licence, so I'm asking debian-legal for their views.
Please keep the Cc to the ITP report on replies.
juanro...@gmail.com wrote:
* Package name: s3sync-ruby
* URL : http://s3sync.net/
* License : Othe
4 matches
Mail list logo
