Bug#510484: Downgrading

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Biebl
Michael Biebl wrote: > The Debian policy in 9.1 doesn't substantiate any special rules regarding > /usr/lib and /usr/share, thus I don't see the severity of serious justified so > downgrading back to normal. And from the lenny RC policy [1] (which I was kindly pointed at by pusling) section 5c 5

Bug#510484: Downgrading

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Biebl
severity 510484 normal thanks Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > severity 510484 serious > thanks > > Not CCing the submitter or letting the BTS mail the submitter when you reply > to a bug is *not* the right way to go. > >> The files are tiny, relatively, I don't see that this is >> release-critical. There

Bug#510484: Downgrading

2009-01-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
severity 510484 serious thanks Not CCing the submitter or letting the BTS mail the submitter when you reply to a bug is *not* the right way to go. > The files are tiny, relatively, I don't see that this is > release-critical. There are a lot of packages that would fall over this > issue. The pol

Bug#510484: Downgrading

2009-01-02 Thread Neil Williams
Package: pm-utils severity normal The files are tiny, relatively, I don't see that this is release-critical. There are a lot of packages that would fall over this issue. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/ p