Neil Williams writes:
> With this particular package, if there was a way of using
> dpkg-buildpackage *without* using make (e.g. just using /bin/sh) , it
> would probably use it.
Well, you can build a Debian package without using dpkg-buildpackage, by
assembling the directories and then using dp
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:23:44 -0800
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Lintian actually isn't confused at all. It's behaving as designed.
> Whether that design is correct in this case is another question, though.
> > dpkg-dev depends on make and Recommends build-essential.
>
> > I appreciate this is an unus
Lintian actually isn't confused at all. It's behaving as designed.
Whether that design is correct in this case is another question, though.
Neil Williams writes:
> The server-side package depends on dpkg-dev and lintian complains:
>
> E: emdebian-grip-server: missing-dep-for-interpreter make =>
Package: lintian
Version: 2.1.3
Severity: normal
I'm designing a fairly unusual package which contains the source to
build another package as well as scripts and other files for the main
package. Therefore, /usr/share/foo/ contains a debian/ directory with
debian/rules and postinst files as well a
4 matches
Mail list logo
