Hi, sorry for delay, I just asked some advices about this issue on
debian-mentors mailing list, I have some doubts about the best way to
solve it, just stay tuned for more info.
Cheers,
--
Davide Puricelli, dpurice...@tin.it
Debian Developer: e...@debian.org | http://www.debian.org
Time looked l
Hello,
The Chicken community is indeed small in size, but I still don't see
this as a reason why Debian should make it more difficult to access
the Chicken compiler -- on the contrary, Debian should be a vehicle
for the wider dissemination of free software. One of the reasons to
choose Debian
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:55:40 +0900
Ivan Raikov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>I am not the maintainer of the chicken package, but I created the
> most recent version of the package. It is ok to rename the csc
> executable, but I think it would be confusing for Chicken users,
> because all online docu
Hello,
I am not the maintainer of the chicken package, but I created the
most recent version of the package. It is ok to rename the csc
executable, but I think it would be confusing for Chicken users,
because all online documentation refers to csc as csc. How about
renaming both the Chicken an
Package: chicken-bin
Severity: important
Dear Chicken Maintainer,
since the Mono 2.0 transition in Debian [0] the mono-devel package
contains a version neutral compiler command (csc) as part of the SDK
tools for the CLI (Common Language Infrastructure) suite:
csc - C# compiler [1]
sn - Strong Nam
5 matches
Mail list logo
