On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 06:17:31PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> i'm just noting that logcheck can run on any posix-compatible shell by
> simply changing one bashism. One bashism does not justity the need of
> the whole bash.
That's not a bad point; I've therefore just removed the three (useless)
ba
On Friday 12 December 2008 17:27:50 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> What would be the real gain of it? Because actually, I don't really see
> it. Especially, what's the deal with calling this severity important? If
> anything it is wishlist, not?
>
> Can you please explain what does upset you so much ab
tags 508546 - patch
tags 508546 + moreinfo
severity 508546 wishlist
Am Freitag, den 12.12.2008, 11:25 +0100 schrieb Yuri D'Elia:
> Package: logcheck
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> /usr/sbin/logcheck depends on bash to work due to a single bashism
> in line 25:
>
> if [ $UID == 0 ]; then
3 matches
Mail list logo