On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:15:50PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de (Adrian Knoth) writes:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:47:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> ardour uses mlock() on its ring buffers to ensure they're available in
> >> physical memory. What if in o
a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de (Adrian Knoth) writes:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:47:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> ardour uses mlock() on its ring buffers to ensure they're available in
>> physical memory. What if in order to meet this requirement, the kernel
>> instead swaps out the proces
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:47:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> ardour uses mlock() on its ring buffers to ensure they're available in
> physical memory. What if in order to meet this requirement, the kernel
> instead swaps out the process stack and has to page that back in? What if
> it drops
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:26PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:14:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > First: I'm going to reassign this bug to libpam-modules, since
> > > /etc/security/limits.conf isn't owned by jackd.
> > > Second: There's usually no need to limit
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:14:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > First: I'm going to reassign this bug to libpam-modules, since
> > /etc/security/limits.conf isn't owned by jackd.
>
> > Second: There's usually no need to limit the size of the maximum locked
> > memory. Actually, some programs
reassign 507248 jackd
thanks
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:47:37PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> First: I'm going to reassign this bug to libpam-modules, since
> /etc/security/limits.conf isn't owned by jackd.
> Second: There's usually no need to limit the size of the maximum locked
> memory. Actual
Hi!
First: I'm going to reassign this bug to libpam-modules, since
/etc/security/limits.conf isn't owned by jackd.
Second: There's usually no need to limit the size of the maximum locked
memory. Actually, some programs (ardour?) even print a warning if you do
so.
Third: with realtime prio, I've
7 matches
Mail list logo