Hi!
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:35:10 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Guillem Jover]
> > Thanks! I'll probably upload a new version targetting etch with this
> > one.
>
> I hope you will to upload one targeted at Lenny too. And quickly, to
> get the problem fixed and allow more people to use d
[Guillem Jover]
> Hmm, thinking about this, I guess it does not make much sense to
> provide a virtual $inetd, as the services depending on it being
> started are the ones which will be under inetd control anyway and
> thus not run from the init system.
I agree.
> Thanks! I'll probably upload a n
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 11:03:30 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Package: inetutils-inetd
> Version: 2:1.5.dfsg.1-8
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: incorrect-provides
>
> The inetutils-inetd init.d script provide the same facility as
> ope
Package: inetutils-inetd
Version: 2:1.5.dfsg.1-8
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: incorrect-provides
The inetutils-inetd init.d script provide the same facility as
openbsd-inetd, and this give problems enabling dependency based boot
sequencing when switc
4 matches
Mail list logo
