Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-28 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi, As Mathieu says: > > As said previously, I believe #506992 is starting to block other > > packages, so it would be nice to make some progress on this. Indeed. So I propose to simply add overrides for both embedded libraries. These libraries have not been a problem for the last 11 years tha

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-28 Thread D. Barbier
On 2011/8/28 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >>> VTK ships a convenient FTGL 1.32 version (April 23 2002), >> >> I guess the question really is twofold: >> >>  1. Are there any

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-28 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> VTK ships a convenient FTGL 1.32 version (April 23 2002), > > I guess the question really is twofold: > >  1. Are there any patches to 1.32 in the VTK tree? no. I do no

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-23 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > >> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident > >> with the ftgl pa

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-23 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:34 AM, D. Barbier wrote: > On 2011/8/23 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >>> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confi

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread D. Barbier
On 2011/8/23 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> >>> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident >>> with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident >> with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h is not installed in >> ftgl installation but

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident > with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h is not installed in > ftgl installation but seems to be used by VTK internals. What are the differences be

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Michael Schutte wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sqlite whether there are >> some changes.  I would think handling this apropriately and overriding >> the ftgl library wit

Bug#638883: Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Schutte
Hi, On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sqlite whether there are > some changes. I would think handling this apropriately and overriding > the ftgl library with the (not so good) reason to push foreward this > package to be

Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:22:54PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote: >> > I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0. >> >> For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883.

Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:22:54PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote: > > I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0. > > For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883. Uhmmm. :-( IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sq

Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Schutte
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote: > I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0. For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883. All the best, -- Michael Schutte | michi@{uiae.at,debian.org} Innsbruck, Austria| happily accept

Bug#506992: vtk: diff for NMU version 5.6.1-6.1

2011-08-22 Thread Michael Schutte
Hey, I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0. Please see the attached nmudiff. Cheers, -- Michael Schutte | michi@{uiae.at,debian.org} Innsbruck, Austria| happily accepting encrypted mail OpenPGP: 0x16fb 517b a866 c3f6 8f11 1485 f3e4 122f 1D8C 261A diff -Nru vtk-5.6.1