On Thu, 04 Dec 2008, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:46:40PM +0100, Peter Palfrader
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2008, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> >
> > > IMHO we should just add back the dependency on
> > > iscsitarget-module
> >
> > I disagree. I should not be forced to run a deb
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 03:09:36PM +0100, Frederik Schüler
wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2008 15:03:24 Peter Palfrader
> wrote:
> > That doesn't mean I have to build the kernel module
> > using debian's infrastructure however.
>
> Indeed, I am preparing a new upload including the patch
> from
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:46:40PM +0100, Peter Palfrader
wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2008, Frederik Schüler wrote:
>
> > IMHO we should just add back the dependency on
> > iscsitarget-module
>
> I disagree. I should not be forced to run a debian
> kernel, or a kernel built using debian's kernel stu
On Thursday 04 December 2008 01:09:36 Frederik Schüler wrote:
> Indeed, I am preparing a new upload including the patch from this bug.
Thanks Frederik,
That's great news.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 15:03:24 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> That doesn't mean I have to build the kernel module using debian's
> infrastructure however.
Indeed, I am preparing a new upload including the patch from this bug.
Best regards
Frederik Schüler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Descri
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wednesday 03 December 2008 13:46:40 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > IMHO we should just add back the dependency on iscsitarget-module
> >
> > I disagree. I should not be forced to run a debian kernel, or a kernel
> > built using debian's ke
Hi!
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 13:46:40 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > IMHO we should just add back the dependency on iscsitarget-module
>
> I disagree. I should not be forced to run a debian kernel, or a kernel
> built using debian's kernel stuff.
iscsitarget is not in vanilla, it is always an
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> IMHO we should just add back the dependency on iscsitarget-module
I disagree. I should not be forced to run a debian kernel, or a kernel
built using debian's kernel stuff.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter
Hi,
IMHO we should just add back the dependency on iscsitarget-module, which is in
lenny thanks to the linux-modules-extra-2.6 package, as the module is
out-of-tree anyway, and must be built from iscsitarget-source for non-debian
packages in order for this package to be of any use at all.
Addi
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 22:45:17 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Installing the iscsitarget package fails if a suitable kernel module
> is not available at configure time. This prevents proper installing
> when you aren't running the final kernel for instance.
Phillipp, Frederik,
This RC bug agains
Package: iscsitarget
Version: 0.4.16+svn162-2
Severity: serious
Installing the iscsitarget package fails if a suitable kernel module
is not available at configure time. This prevents proper installing
when you aren't running the final kernel for instance.
The initscript and maintainerscript shou
11 matches
Mail list logo
