close 505798
thanks
Mark, is it really so hard to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am
getting tired of reminding you.
Mark Hobley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Ben. I have submitted a patch #506481, which hopefully
> will close this #505798 bug.
Thanks. Submitting a patch does not close a bug, so
> Mark Hobley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It is a big problem for packages that I compile myself, using
> > Autotools, because the compiler keeps detecting the architecture as
> > 686 and building for a 686,
That's because the build host CPU really is i686. Installing a -486
kernel does n
[Please don't drop the CC against [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm
quoting your entire message so that it gets archived as part of
the bug log.]
Mark Hobley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> From: Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Please give a specific example of a package that is adversely
>> affected by t
Mark Hobley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If a system is installed at a build level of say i486, ie the kernel is
> vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-486, the generated configure scripts may use a build
> level above this, even though the system is supposed to be i486
> compatible.
>
> We have chosen a 486 build
Package: autoconf
Version: 2.61-8
Severity: normal
If a system is installed at a build level of say i486, ie the kernel is
vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-486, the generated configure scripts may use a build
level above this, even though the system is supposed to be i486
compatible.
We have chosen a 486 buil
5 matches
Mail list logo
