Hello Marcus,
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:46:24PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> Forgive my stupidity, but after reading this bug report I'm still
> not able to figure out how to retire a topgit branch that is no
> longer needed for a new upstream version. Should I tg-delete it, or
> will this mess
Forgive my stupidity, but after reading this bug report I'm still not
able to figure out how to retire a topgit branch that is no longer
needed for a new upstream version. Should I tg-delete it, or will this
mess things up?
Cheers,
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..
Hello Stefano,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:52:24AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:32:08PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > It would be good to be able to remove a tg branch properly, for
> > instance when upstream included a patch and the topic branch is thus
> > obs
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:32:08PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> It would be good to be able to remove a tg branch properly, for
> instance when upstream included a patch and the topic branch is thus
> obsolete.
So, I've been hit badly by this, any news on a proper fix?
In the interim, it would
Package: topgit
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
It would be good to be able to remove a tg branch properly, for
instance when upstream included a patch and the topic branch is thus
obsolete.
The following discussion has already happened on the Git list, only
one message is releva
5 matches
Mail list logo
