On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:45:37PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:27:14PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> As far as this bug is tagged unreproducible: I checked it again and
>> can't reproduce.
> Have you tried with a nanosecond-resolution-timestamp filesystem,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:27:14PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> As far as this bug is tagged unreproducible: I checked it again and
> can't reproduce.
Have you tried with a nanosecond-resolution-timestamp filesystem, and
the autotools installed? If your filesystem rounds timestamps to the
s
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [090212 14:00 +0100]
> severity 505088 important
> thanks
>
> Lionel Elie Mamane writes:
> > Maintainer has put it to severity "minor" (not sure why: because it
> > applies only to nanosecond timestamp filesystems? because he thought
> > it did not apply to the version in
severity 505088 important
thanks
Lionel Elie Mamane writes:
> Maintainer has put it to severity "minor" (not sure why: because it
> applies only to nanosecond timestamp filesystems? because he thought
> it did not apply to the version in lenny?), which I consider too
> low. Not entering BTS ping-
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:14:36AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> So, please advise.
>
>From a RT point of view, this isn't going to have a fix in for lenny.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.t
5 matches
Mail list logo
