On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Petr Salinger wrote:
oh... (that's surprising, since I might have expected some portability
issue with TAB3, but not OCRNL or ONLRET since they're defined in X/Open).
Didn't ncurses 5.6 compile with kFreeBSD?
They did, the problem started with ncurses 5.6+20081011-1 (5
oh... (that's surprising, since I might have expected some portability issue
with TAB3, but not OCRNL or ONLRET since they're defined in X/Open).
Didn't ncurses 5.6 compile with kFreeBSD?
They did, the problem started with ncurses 5.6+20081011-1 (5.6+20081004-1
have been ok), see http://bui
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Petr Salinger wrote:
The chunk of code you're pointing to hasn't changed for a long time (it's
in ncurses 4.2). If it's broken now, it's either because tset's use of
header files has changed, or that kFreeBSD's headers have changed.
The ncurses 5.6+20081004-1 have been bu
The chunk of code you're pointing to hasn't changed for a long time (it's
in ncurses 4.2). If it's broken now, it's either because tset's use of
header files has changed, or that kFreeBSD's headers have changed.
The ncurses 5.6+20081004-1 have been built fine, the
ncurses 5.6+20081011-1 failed
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:20:10PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Package: ncurses
> Severity: important
> Version: 5.7-1
> Tags: patch
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
>
> Hi,
>
> the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
Which of the values isn't defined?
The chunk o
Package: ncurses
Severity: important
Version: 5.7-1
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
It needs small tweak, se bellow.
It would also be nice if you can ask upstream
to include this change.
Thanks in advance
6 matches
Mail list logo
