On 2008-11-06 dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:33:08PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> I am reluctant
>> to go immediately to unstable since it requires a shlibs bump due to
>> an added function.
> I definitely wouldn't call myself a shared lib packaging
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2008-11-06 dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> reassign 503833 libtasn1-3
>> severity 503833 important
>> thanks
>
>> Upstream has developed a patch:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-11/msg0.html
>
>> If I apply th
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:33:08PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2008-11-06 dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > reassign 503833 libtasn1-3
> > severity 503833 important
> > thanks
>
> > Upstream has developed a patch:
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-11/msg000
On 2008-11-06 dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reassign 503833 libtasn1-3
> severity 503833 important
> thanks
> Upstream has developed a patch:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-11/msg0.html
> If I apply this to libtasn1-3 it fixes the problem for me.
> However
reassign 503833 libtasn1-3
severity 503833 important
thanks
Upstream has developed a patch:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-11/msg0.html
If I apply this to libtasn1-3 it fixes the problem for me.
However, I had set the nocheck DEB_BUILD_OPTION because it causes
libtasn1-
5 matches
Mail list logo