Bug#449497: Bug#503814: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] Bug#449497: closed by Michael Koch (Bug#449497: fixed in hannah-foo2zjs 1:1)

2009-10-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:21:58 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > Please don't play bug ping-pong and reopen bugs which are closed just > because you like to do so. this isn't ping pong...i haven't touched the bug in over 8 months...that would be one crazy long game. > We have implemented the solution t

Bug#503814: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware

2008-11-03 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 503814 foo2zjs forcemerge 449497 503814 thanks There's no reason to have a separate bug report here assigned to the technical committee; re-merging the bugs. If this needs to be reconsidered by the TC, please reassign the bugs as a whole to both foo2zjs and the tech-ctte virtual package

Bug#503814: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] foo2zjs

2008-11-03 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > FYI, the Release Team was asked for an advice on Sun, 26 October [2]. > However, I know we (the Debian foo2zjs maintainers) decided to go to the > tech-ctte just two days later... > Indeed, hence the lack of comment. However, as this

Bug#503814: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] foo2zjs

2008-11-03 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! Can you please keep the foo2zjs-maintainer mailing list cc:ed? If you do so, no need to cc: me, I read the list. TIA. I'm sorry for the long mail: I performed more tests with the only foo2zjs printer I have [1] and I found some interesting stuff, please read below. I tried to be as m

Bug#503814: foo2zjs

2008-11-01 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:52:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > 1. Currently, the submitter claims that the bug is serious, the > maintainer don't think so, and there is no decision by the release team > yet. So the current state of the bug isn't serious, but important. ie, the views (on serious

Bug#503814: foo2zjs

2008-10-31 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Andreas Barth wrote: > As this bug didn't get a decision from the release team yet, I'd propose > the following decision by the tech ctte: > > 1. Currently, the submitter claims that the bug is serious, the > maintainer don't think so, and there is no decision by the release

Bug#503814: foo2zjs

2008-10-31 Thread Andreas Barth
* Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081028 10:08]: > > reassign -2 tech-ctte > Bug#503814: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware > Bug reassigned from package `foo2zjs' to `tech-ctte'. As this bug didn't get a decision from the releas

Bug#503814: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] Bug#449497: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware

2008-10-31 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Michael! Adding the d-release mailing list to cc:. On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:41:25 +0100, Michael Gilbert wrote: > i'll go ahead and start the discussion since no one else is running > with it. this matter is rather urgent since the problem is now being > considered release-critical for lenny. [