Bug#502140: Comments on screen savers and PAM upgrades

2008-12-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 04:18:41PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > So, I've been thinking about this issue. I'm not sure I have great > solutions for the etch->lenny case. However it seems like we could do > better for the future. > Here's a possibility. When libpam failes to be able to dlopen a >

Bug#502140: Comments on screen savers and PAM upgrades

2008-12-13 Thread Sam Hartman
So, I've been thinking about this issue. I'm not sure I have great solutions for the etch->lenny case. However it seems like we could do better for the future. Here's a possibility. When libpam failes to be able to dlopen a module, it could look at a version epoch stored somewhere in s/etc.