On Friday 06 March 2009 03:46:32 Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Mark W. Giles wrote:
> > I've just started trying to upgrade from etch to lenny and I'm
> > encountering this same problem. The last reply I was able to find
> > about this bug was on 2009-02-02. Has there
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Mark W. Giles wrote:
> I've just started trying to upgrade from etch to lenny and I'm
> encountering this same problem. The last reply I was able to find
> about this bug was on 2009-02-02. Has there been a resolution yet?
Nope.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Kel Modderman wrote:
> Steve Vorlon couldn't reproduce this [0], and my conclusions are the same as
> his. What is the status of this bug (and its clone)?
Still reproducable...
apt-get install libgssapi2 libldap2 libpci2 libsasl2 libssp0
selinux-policy-refpolicy-t
On Saturday 11 October 2008 23:20:26 Sven Joachim wrote:
> clone 501855 -1
> reassign -1 initscripts, insserv
> severity -1 important
> thanks
>
> On 2008-10-11 14:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > Thanks, now I see that there is indeed a dependency loop: the lenny
> > version of initscripts co
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 08:48:58PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > No, it's only aptitude which tries to remove the essential package on
>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 08:48:58PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, it's only aptitude which tries to remove the essential package on
> > dist-upgrade. Installing insserv in etch, switching sources.list to lenny,
>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it's only aptitude which tries to remove the essential package on
> dist-upgrade. Installing insserv in etch, switching sources.list to lenny,
> and running 'apt-get dist-upgrade', apt has no problem calculating the
>
reassign 501855 aptitude
thanks
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:02:45PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> reassign 501855 apt 0.7.14
> thanks
> Hm, that looks fairly normal. Probably it would work if you upgrade
> initscripts before the full-upgrade. However, it does not explain why
> apt wanted to tempo
On Saturday 11 October 2008 22:54:22 Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-10-11 14:03 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hm, that looks fairly normal. Probably it would work if you upgrade
> >> initscripts before the full-
clone 501855 -1
reassign -1 initscripts, insserv
severity -1 important
thanks
On 2008-10-11 14:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Thanks, now I see that there is indeed a dependency loop: the lenny
> version of initscripts conflicts with the etch version of insserv and
> vice versa, so apt has to re
On 2008-10-11 14:03 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hm, that looks fairly normal. Probably it would work if you upgrade
>> initscripts before the full-upgrade. However, it does not explain why
>> apt wanted to tempora
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, that looks fairly normal. Probably it would work if you upgrade
> initscripts before the full-upgrade. However, it does not explain why
> apt wanted to temporarily remove initscripts in the first place. This
> looks
reassign 501855 apt 0.7.14
thanks
On 2008-10-11 10:20 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2008-10-11 03:44 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>
>>> Package: upgrade-reports
>>> Severity: normal
>>
>> I'm afraid the severit
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-10-11 03:44 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
>> Package: upgrade-reports
>> Severity: normal
>
> I'm afraid the severity might have to be bumped to grave if other
> people see this problem as well.
>
>> I'm trying t
On 2008-10-11 03:44 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Package: upgrade-reports
> Severity: normal
I'm afraid the severity might have to be bumped to grave if other
people see this problem as well.
> I'm trying to upgrade a fresh Etch install to Lenny. I've hit a speedbump, it
> seems, see below
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade a fresh Etch install to Lenny. I've hit a speedbump, it
seems, see below.
How should I (or a normal user) solve this?
Olaf
# aptitude full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state inf
16 matches
Mail list logo
