Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Vincent, * Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-04 12:16]: > Martin Geisler wrote: > > "Ken Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > Hint: if anyone can point me to a specific changeset to fix the second > security bug fixed in 1.0.2 ("Mercurial before 1.0.2 does not enforce the

Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread nion
Hi Vincent, * Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-04 12:16]: > Martin Geisler wrote: [...] > >> But when I look at the Debian site: > >> http://packages.debian.org/etch/mercurial it lists mercurial > >> (0.9.1-1+etch1) which implies an even older version than Ubuntu. > > > > The current s

Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread Benoit Boissinot
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hint: if anyone can point me to a specific changeset to fix the second > security bug fixed in 1.0.2 ("Mercurial before 1.0.2 does not enforce the > allowpull permission"), I will backport it to 1.0.1 in the next Debian >

Bug#500781: ubuntu/debian repos

2008-10-04 Thread Vincent Danjean
Martin Geisler wrote: > "Ken Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I've been meaning to ask about why the Ubuntu hardy repo was so out >> of date. It currently has v0.9.5. I googled Vincent and found this >> page: >> http://www-id.imag.fr/Laboratoire/Membres/Danjean_Vincent/deb.html#mercurial >>