2008/10/16 Jean-Francois Dockes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks a lot for running these tests and sending the results.
>
> It's quite reassuring that initial indexing works as expected.
>
> About later indexing passes, I had another look at how Recoll *really*
> works (as opposed to how I thought it
Peter Salisbury writes:
> 2008/9/30 Jean-Francois Dockes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > If Peter can spare some time to do more testing, I'd be quite
> > interested by the output of the following sequence:
> > - Add "loglevel = 4" to ~/.recoll/recoll.conf
> > - Uninstall the 3 helper packages, the
2008/9/30 Jean-Francois Dockes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> Kartik Mistry writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Peter Salisbury
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
> > > every time. It was only when I ran it fro
Hello,
Kartik Mistry writes:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Peter Salisbury
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
> > every time. It was only when I ran it from a terminal that I realised
> > it was missing some required pa
severity 500690 wishlist
thanks
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Peter Salisbury
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: recoll
> Version: 1.10.6-1
Thanks for reporting bug, Peter.
> I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
> every time. It was only when I ran it from
Package: recoll
Version: 1.10.6-1
I installed recoll on a fairly sparse system and it took ages to index
every time. It was only when I ran it from a terminal that I realised
it was missing some required packages for indexing certain types of
file. Ideally a better message would be given via the U
6 matches
Mail list logo
