OK. I thought the NMU fixed this, but apparently it didn't. Checked in
a patch.
Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 November 2008 at 7:57, John Goerzen wrote:
>> Err, what version do you mean when you say "current"? This should have
>> been fixed.
>
> After installing 2.4.2-3.1 I removed pyt
On Sunday, 16 November 2008 at 7:57, John Goerzen wrote:
> Err, what version do you mean when you say "current"? This should have
> been fixed.
After installing 2.4.2-3.1 I removed python2.4, now 2.4.3-1 depends on it
again:
$ apt-cache show bacula-fd
Package: bacula-fd
Priority: optional
Secti
Christian Ohm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The current bacula packages depend on python2.4 again (on i386 at least).
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Ohm
>
>
>
Err, what version do you mean when you say "current"? This should have
been fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Hello,
The current bacula packages depend on python2.4 again (on i386 at least).
Best regards,
Christian Ohm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 matches
Mail list logo