Hi Félix
>Well:
>grub install "(md0)' leads to the same error message
>
>grub-install /dev/sda then grun-install /dev/sdb leads to other
>problems: the device naming is not consistant from one boot to
> another. Sometimes I've md0 with /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 and
> sometimes with sdb1 and adc1
Am Samstag, den 25.07.2009, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh):
> Le 25/07/2009 08:50:10, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
> >
> >
> >That patch is now commited upstream so good that this is now fixed.
> Fine
>
> >[jean-...@tangerine] % sudo grub-install /dev/md0
> >You can't install to /dev/md0,
Le 25/07/2009 08:50:10, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>
>
>That patch is now commited upstream so good that this is now fixed.
Fine
>[jean-...@tangerine] % sudo grub-install /dev/md0
>You can't install to /dev/md0, either use grub-install '(md0)' or the
>old way with grub-install /dev/sda etc.
>That sho
Am Samstag, den 25.07.2009, 08:43 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh):
> Hi Felix,
>
> Le 24/07/2009 22:52:42, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>
> >
> >Please test if the attached patch solves it.
> >
>
> No more segfault now but the following messages:
> [jean-...@tangerine] % sudo grub-install /dev/
Hi Felix,
Le 24/07/2009 22:52:42, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>
>Please test if the attached patch solves it.
>
No more segfault now but the following messages:
[jean-...@tangerine] % sudo grub-install /dev/md0
~
grub-setup: warn: Attempting to install GRUB to a partitionless
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 20:40 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh):
> Hi Felix,
>
> >> Jean-Luc
> >
> >Oh not good.
> >Then please do again a debug compile with `DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip
> >noopt debug" dpkg-buildpackage -b'
> >and get a backtrace with gdb.
> >See [0] for my previous mail b
Hi Felix,
>> Jean-Luc
>
>Oh not good.
>Then please do again a debug compile with `DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip
>noopt debug" dpkg-buildpackage -b'
>and get a backtrace with gdb.
>See [0] for my previous mail but note the spaces now in
>DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS instead of the commas. I was wrong.
>
>[0] htt
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 18:31 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh):
> Hi,
>
> I use now grub-pc 1.96+20090721-4
> I've no more *this* error.
> Here is the log of an update-grub command:
>
> [jean-...@tangerine] % sudo update-grub
> Generating grub.cfg ...
> Found Debian background: moreblue
Hi,
I use now grub-pc 1.96+20090721-4
I've no more *this* error.
Here is the log of an update-grub command:
[jean-...@tangerine] % sudo update-grub
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found Debian background: moreblue-orbit-grub.png
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-rc4-k8-1
Found initrd image: /boot/
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 16:48 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
(f5ibh):
> Hi,
>
> While using update-grub in the kernel update, an error 130 was
> reported.
> It appears that there is a segfault in grub-probe.
>
> -->8-
> [jean-...@t
Hi Felix
Le 21.08.2008 17:29:57, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>
>>
>> There is no disk *removed*. BUT the device name of the disks
>allocated
>> by the system to the disks is not consistant from one boot to the
>> other.
>Well I mean something like that in `mdadm -Q --detail /dev/md0'
> output:
>
Le 21.08.2008 19:31:04, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>
>Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 19:12 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
>(f5ibh):
>>
>> So, attached the bt full output and the grub-probe binary (bzip2,
>> warning, it is built for X86_64).
>That's what I'm using too
>I have now even compiled myself
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 19:12 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
(f5ibh):
>
> So, attached the bt full output and the grub-probe binary (bzip2,
> warning, it is built for X86_64).
That's what I'm using too
I have now even compiled myself the 24-8 and used that grub-probe binary
with your core f
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 18:40 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
(f5ibh):
Hi,
> >
> >Would be very good if you would forward this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (but
> >you need to subscribe first) and the /usr/sbin/grub-probe else the
> >corefile is useless.
>
> Please find attached the core and th
Le 21.08.2008 17:52:46, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>
>Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
>(f5ibh):
>> As I told, I've nothing removed:
>>
>Ok just though you misunderstood me, well I even hoped that.
>Do you have maybe other mdraid super blocks lying around on other
>p
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
(f5ibh):
> As I old, I've nothing removed:
>
Ok just though you misunderstood me, well I even hoped that.
Do you have maybe other mdraid super blocks lying around on other
partitions
`mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdxy' would get ri
Le 21.08.2008 17:29:57, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>> There is no disk *removed*. BUT the device name of the disks
>allocated
>> by the system to the disks is not consistant from one boot to the
>> other.
>Well I mean something like that in `mdadm -Q --detail /dev/md0'
> output:
>
>(Don't worry ab
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon
(f5ibh):
> Hello Felix,
>
> Le 21.08.2008 17:02:07, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
> >
>
> >There's one which is not yet fixed upstream and because you're using
> >raid1 I suspect it's the one you have.
> >
> >Please do `mdadm -Q --detai
Hello Felix,
Le 21.08.2008 17:02:07, Felix Zielcke a écrit :
>
>There's one which is not yet fixed upstream and because you're using
>raid1 I suspect it's the one you have.
>
>Please do `mdadm -Q --detail /dev/md0' for all your md devices you
>have.
>If there's one disk removed then grub-probe se
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 16:48 +0200 schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh):
> Hi,
Hello,
> While using update-grub in the kernel update, an error 130 was reported.
> It appears that there is a segfault in grub-probe.
There's one which is not yet fixed upstream and because you're using
raid1 I s
Package: grub-common
Version: 1.96+20080724-8
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
While using update-grub in the kernel update, an error 130 was reported.
It appears that there is a segfault in grub-probe.
- -->8-
21 matches
Mail list logo
