Andreas Henriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The previous discussions has lead nowhere. No use in discussing it yet
> again, instead it's time to act!
Put down that crack pipe. Now.
> I offer to fix up all packages to exim4 | mail-transport-agent *and*
> when there is a working default-mta pr
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I offer to fix up all packages to exim4 | mail-transport-agent *and*
Don't do it on any packages that tagged the bug wontfix, at least not
without asking first (AND getting a positive response). Some of the
packages have real reasons to prefer an M
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:37:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Where did you discuss this mass filing of (useless) bugs before you
> > submitted them?
The previous discussions has lead nowhere. No use in discussing it yet
again, instead it's time to act!
>
> In particular, these bugs are *c
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=andreas%40fatal.se
> > Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is
> > generally
> > considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package prov
Package: sks
Severity: normal
Hello!
Your packag depends on postfix | mail-transport-agent. Exim (v4) is generally
considered the default mta in Debian and is also the package providing
mail-transport-agent which has the highest priority.
Is there any particular reason why your package needs to d
5 matches
Mail list logo
