Bug#494768: sendfile bails out with error

2008-10-22 Thread cfeller
> sendfile has a wrapper in libc, but I doubt that it does anything > other than call the sendfile syscall. Maybe you used smbfs before and > now use cifs? Smbfs was removed after 2.6.23 in Debian. Or your smb > server changed its behaviour. The CIFS server is Solaris 10, Samba 3.0.28. It is d

Bug#494768: sendfile bails out with error

2008-10-14 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 14 October 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.5 > linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64 2.6.25-1 > linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 2.6.25-6 > linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 2.6.25-7 > > and none of them resolved the problem. This is a bi

Bug#494768: sendfile bails out with error

2008-10-13 Thread cfeller
Stephan, I tried a few at random: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.5 linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64 2.6.25-1 linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 2.6.25-6 linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 2.6.25-7 and none of them resolved the problem. This is a bit troubling to me. Are th

Bug#494768: sendfile bails out with error

2008-09-30 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 30 September 2008, Chad Feller wrote: > You'll have to tell me where I can get older Debian kernels as I > don't have anything older than 2.6.26-* in the > /var/cache/apt/archives on that machine (or any other AMD64 Debian > machine for that matter). Normally on snapshot.debian.net, but

Bug#494768: sendfile bails out with error

2008-09-29 Thread Chad Feller
> Chad, I think it would really be helpful if you could check exactly > which kernel version worked. Stephan, You'll have to tell me where I can get older Debian kernels as I don't have anything older than 2.6.26-* in the /var/cache/apt/archives on that machine (or any other AMD64 Debian machi

Bug#494768: sendfile bails out with error

2008-09-28 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Monday 29 September 2008, Bastian Blank wrote: > The given strace shows that sendfile returns a proper error for the > sendfile invocation (EOVERFLOW). apache must not ignore errors > returned by syscalls. This is not the issue here, apache works as documented. The point is that, according to

Bug#494768: sendfile bails out with error

2008-09-28 Thread Bastian Blank
reassign 494768 apache2 thanks The given strace shows that sendfile returns a proper error for the sendfile invocation (EOVERFLOW). apache must not ignore errors returned by syscalls. Bastian -- Only a fool fights in a burning house. -- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stard