Bug#494763: lft: New upstream

2011-09-19 Thread Ed Spiridonov
2011/9/15 Ed Spiridonov : > Why so old version is used? > Upstream close bug #182173, so upgrade is very useful. bug #299631 is closed by upstream as well, so no old bugs will remain after upgrade. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#494763: lft: New upstream

2011-09-15 Thread Ed Spiridonov
Why so old version is used? Upstream close bug #182173, so upgrade is very useful. BTW, project do homepage change twice: http://web.archive.org/web/20071013144626/http://mainnerve.com/lft/index.html http://oppleman.com/lft/ http://pwhois.org/lft/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r

Bug#494763: lft: New upstream (3.1)

2008-12-14 Thread Vernon Tang
If the maintainer ever decides to update the package, I've attached two patches against lft 3.1 I use in my own internal lft 3.1 package. poll is pretty important; it makes lft use poll instead of assuming that the read timeout passed to pcap will work. On Linux, the read timeout doesn't work,

Bug#494763: lft: New upstream (3.1)

2008-08-11 Thread Daniel Baumann
Package: lft Severity: wishlist Hi, lft is availble in version 3.1. It would be nice if you could upgrade the package in Debian to a more recent version. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: ht