Patch by upstream attached. SVN rev. 4981.
# 2009-04-03 Werner Koch
#
# * gpgv.c (main): Pass readonly flag to keydb_add_resource.
# * keydb.c (keydb_add_resource): Add arg READONLY.
#
Index: g10/gpgv.c
===
--- g10/gpgv.c
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I don't understand why, when the point is about verifying signatures (as
> stated in the whatis entry). Why does it have to assume they are
> trustworthy and then to use its very own keyring? I'd assume as a first
You need to know whether the k
Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/08/2008):
> Do you mean the error message which probably should be "file not
> found"?
Indeed. A missing file doesn't really qualify as a “general error” to
me.
> The man page says:
>
> gpgv assumes that all keys in the keyring are trustworthy. By
> defau
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpgv /tmp/blender_2.46+dfsg-3.dsc
> | gpgv: keyblock resource `/home/kibi/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg': general error
Do you mean the error message which probably should be "file not found"?
> | gpgv: Signature made Mon Jul
retitle 494040 gpgv: Unintelligible behaviour and error messages.
thanks
(I initially meant to report 2 bugs but that's basically the same one.)
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/08/2008):
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpgv /tmp/blender_2.46+dfsg-3.dsc
> | gpgv: keyblock resource `/home/kibi/.g
Package: gpgv
Version: 1.4.9-2
Severity: important
(Happens also in -3)
Once upon a time, gpgv was said to be a nice and quick way to check
whether a signature is valid.
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ rm .gnupg/ -rf
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wget -q
| http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/blender/blen
6 matches
Mail list logo
