Guillem Jover dixit:
>> Hm. I need the one of the system the produced binary will
>> eventually run on. (All this build/host/target is rather
>> confusing and badly documented.) Which one is that?
>
>That's *_HOST_*. And it seems to me to be properly documented in
>dpkg-architecture(1), and in '4.
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 23:03:05 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Guillem Jover dixit:
> > Here, even w/o having looked at the rules file, I think you mean
> > DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU, the *_BUILD_* variables are most of the time the
> > wrong ones, mostly relevant only when cross-building.
>
> Hm. I need
Guillem Jover dixit:
>Here, even w/o having looked at the rules file, I think you mean
>DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU, the *_BUILD_* variables are most of the time the
>wrong ones, mostly relevant only when cross-building.
Hm. I need the one of the system the produced binary will
eventually run on. (All this
Hi!
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 21:17:06 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> diff -u pmake-1.111/debian/rules pmake-1.111/debian/rules
> --- pmake-1.111/debian/rules
> +++ pmake-1.111/debian/rules
> @@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
>
> #export DH_VERBOSE=1
>
> -ARCH=$(shell dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture)
> +ARC
tags 493839 + patch
tags 547459 + patch
thanks
Dear Sam,
I have prepared a patch to a four-year untouched package which would
probably not have built cleanly these days anyway. The main new feature
is support for hurd-i386 (although this is done as a kludge; I’d do it
properly if we were to re-ba
5 matches
Mail list logo
