> No, we can only remove source + all related binary packages from testing
> and won't do it otherwise as it would be a mess with security updates or
> rebuilds...
looks like you're going to have to change the rules script so that the
epiphany-webkit binary package does not get built.
--
To UN
Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> I don't know if it is possible to ignore a sole binary package or if it
>> would be necessary to re-upload epiphany to t-p-u without the webkit
>> package. Frankly, I'd like to avoid the latter.
>
> i think you can ask the release manager to remove specific binary package
> I don't know if it is possible to ignore a sole binary package or if it
> would be necessary to re-upload epiphany to t-p-u without the webkit
> package. Frankly, I'd like to avoid the latter.
i think you can ask the release manager to remove specific binary packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
As long as epiphany-browser defaults to epiphany-gecko, few people will
ever notice there's an alternative.
Maybe a notice to the package description could be added, like:
"""
(ephy standard desc)
.
This is the experimental webkit backend version of the browser, for an
stable browsing experience u
Le dimanche 27 juillet 2008 à 18:34 -0400, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> i don't believe that epiphany-webkit is ready to be included in a stable
> release yet. yes, it can render webpages, and now even supports plugins,
> but there are enough issues, which are not that severe individually, but
> c
Package: epiphany-webkit
Version: 2.22.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
i don't believe that epiphany-webkit is ready to be included in a stable
release yet. yes, it can render webpages, and now even supports plugins,
but there are enough issues, which are not that sev
6 matches
Mail list logo
