Bug#492606: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#492606: add lzo again

2009-02-07 Thread Simon Josefsson
tags 492606 wontfix thanks It seems we are not doing anything here, tagging it accordingly in the bug tracker. /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#492606: add lzo again

2008-08-06 Thread Simon Josefsson
Note that license conflict wasn't the only reason: LZO compression is not standardized for TLS, and GnuTLS have just hi-jacked a private use compression id 0xF2 for it. Is there anyone out there that actually needs to use LZO in TLS? If so, it would be useful to describe the protocol in an IETF d

Bug#492606: add lzo again

2008-07-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: gnutls26 Version: 2.2.0-1 In version 2.2.0-1 you dropped linking with lzo2 because of license conflicts. Just to let you know, lzo2 is now GPLv2+, so you can add it again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE