Bug#491560: binutils-avr: downgrading to 2.18-3 works

2008-07-21 Thread Alexander Neumann
Hi, * Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the build problem of gcc-avr seems to be that a few of the patches I > apply has now been applied to the src provided by gcc-src. Ah, I see... > To prevent this kind of problems in the future do you think it's a > good idea to Build-Depend on an exac

Bug#490310: Bug#491560: binutils-avr: downgrading to 2.18-3 works

2008-07-21 Thread Hakan Ardo
Hi, the build problem of gcc-avr seems to be that a few of the patches I apply has now been applied to the src provided by gcc-src. To prevent this kind of problems in the future do you think it's a good idea to Build-Depend on an exact version of gcc-4.3-source? I tried something like that some y

Bug#491560: binutils-avr: downgrading to 2.18-3 works

2008-07-21 Thread Hakan Ardo
Hi, the problem is that you need to upgrade avr-gcc to 1:4.3.0-3, because I had to move the /usr/avr dir to become fhs compatible. I suppse I should have made the new binutils conflict with the old gcc to reflect this, but I missed that. The new gcc has been stuck in unstable because of some build

Bug#491560: binutils-avr: downgrading to 2.18-3 works

2008-07-21 Thread Alexander Neumann
Hi Hakan, * Alexander Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I verified this bug on several machines, downgrading from 2.18-4 to 2.18-3 > works. I also set the severity from 'normal' to 'important', because this > bug renders the package unusable. Will you be able to upload a fixed version BEFORE

Bug#491560: binutils-avr: downgrading to 2.18-3 works

2008-07-21 Thread Alexander Neumann
Package: binutils-avr Followup-For: Bug #491560 Hi, I verified this bug on several machines, downgrading from 2.18-4 to 2.18-3 works. I also set the severity from 'normal' to 'important', because this bug renders the package unusable. Cheers, - Alexander -- System Information: Debian Release: