On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
> OK, a fix has been uploaded. I guess this should hang around in unstable
> for a couple of days before I send it as a proposed update to the
> release team, right? (My experience with this process is limited, so
> hints are appreciated. ;-) )
Yes it needs
Bart Samwel wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Christian Perrier wrote:
>> Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>> severity 491396 serious
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
to release w
Hi Christian,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> severity 491396 serious
>> thanks
>>
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
>>> Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
>>> to release with a non-working ACPI support.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I'm still pondering raising an RC issue on linux-2.6 for /proc/acpi
> to be back. I know that bugs have been reassigned to various
> packages when they were reported but I think I would then go up to
> CTTE as an attempt to revert to /proc/acpi suppor
Hi Christian,
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
severity 491396 serious
thanks
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
to release with a non-working ACPI support.
I should even ha
Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> severity 491396 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
> > to release with a non-working ACPI support.
> >
> > I should even have tagged the bug as
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
>>> The bug is in acpid, right?
>>
>> Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
>> use /sys/class/power_supply/ instea
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
>> Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
>
> The bug is in acpid, right?
Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
use /sys/class/power_supply/ instead of /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ which has
been removed in recent kernels (2.6.26 i
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
The bug is in acpid, right?
Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
use /sys/class/power_supply/ instead of /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ which has
been removed in rec
severity 491396 serious
thanks
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
> to release with a non-working ACPI support.
>
> I should even have tagged the bug as release critical, imho. Leaving
> that up to the maintainer.
Hi Raphael,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
severity 491396 serious
thanks
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
to release with a non-working ACPI support.
I should even have tagged the bug as release critical, imho. Leavi
severity 491396 important
thanks
Not having the actions executed when the power is plugged on/off is
hardly hurting the acpi-support package which is still the default way
to handle all that power management stuff in lenny.
Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
to
12 matches
Mail list logo
