Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>> You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see
>> how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096 perspective.)
>
> May this change be applicable to 2.6.26 or will i
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:19:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> > You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see
> > how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096
> > perspective.)
> May
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
> You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see
> how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096 perspective.)
May this change be applicable to 2.6.26 or will it break something else?
Bast
maximilian attems wrote:
> hello
>
> after getting an irc query and bug report on our currently set number of
> cpu for the upcoming lenny release:
> /boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32
>
> -> http://bugs.debian.org/491309
>
> we came to this issue:
> 10:13 1345623 3148364 417112 491
Hi,
from cujrrent intel and amd roadmaps, expect 4-way and 8-way 12 core
boxes during the lenny life cycle.
I think NR_CPUS should really be set to 96, at least.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:25:32AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> we came to this issue:
> 10:13 1345623 3148364 417112 4911099
hello
after getting an irc query and bug report on our currently set number of
cpu for the upcoming lenny release:
/boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32
-> http://bugs.debian.org/491309
we came to this issue:
10:13 1345623 3148364 417112 4911099 4aeffb x86_64-255/vmlinux
10:13 133988
6 matches
Mail list logo
