On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
> > *does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt). So maybe this
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > Package: tetex-ucs
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > When I reassigned a b
On 2008-07-08 16:30 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-) You're looking for
>> latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.
>
> d'oh, sorry about that. latex, tetex, texlive
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-ucs
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
> > bounce. The Maintainer addr
On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Package: tetex-ucs
> Severity: serious
>
> When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
> bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
> IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
Even if the package does
Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
AP
6 matches
Mail list logo
