Hi !
Le Wednesday 02 July 2008 23:13:52 Moritz Muehlenhoff, vous avez écrit :
> > Besides, I don't want to upload again with the SSL issue. First time it
> > was by mistake, now that I'm aware of it, I wouldn't like to do it on
> > purpose.
>
> Can you make a separate RC bug about the SSL
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Monday 30 June 2008 11:18:18 Steffen Joeris, vous avez écrit :
> > > Of course, you can expect a quick upload otherwise.
> >
> > Thanks for the information. However, we are still distributing the package
> > in our archives at the moment. It might be a good idea to fix th
Le Monday 30 June 2008 11:18:18 Steffen Joeris, vous avez écrit :
> > Of course, you can expect a quick upload otherwise.
>
> Thanks for the information. However, we are still distributing the package
> in our archives at the moment. It might be a good idea to fix the issue in
> unstable and let it
Hi Romain
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:53:10 am Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Monday 30 June 2008 09:53:15 Steffen Joeris, vous avez écrit :
> > The patchsets are not included in the current sid version. CVE ids for
> > both DoS are pending.
> > Please also upload with high urgency, so that the package hit
Le Monday 30 June 2008 09:53:15 Steffen Joeris, vous avez écrit :
> The patchsets are not included in the current sid version. CVE ids for both
> DoS are pending.
> Please also upload with high urgency, so that the package hits testing
> soon.
Thanks for the report.
However, I have an issue with
Package: linuxdcpp
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security, patch
Justification: user security hole
Hi
The following email came over one of the security lists:
Hey,
Linux DC++ (linuxdcpp) is a Direct Connect client based on the same
client code as DC++, so it is vulnerable to the recen
6 matches
Mail list logo
