tags 488275 patch
thanks
Quoting Dustin Kirkland (kirkl...@canonical.com):
> Here is a patch that provides the status action functionality for nmbd,
> smbd, and winbindd. I developed this against Ubuntu and am submitting
> this for inclusion in Debian. Thanks to Steve for his copious feedback
>
Here is a patch that provides the status action functionality for nmbd,
smbd, and winbindd. I developed this against Ubuntu and am submitting
this for inclusion in Debian. Thanks to Steve for his copious feedback
on IRC.
Note that the hunk dealing with the debian/control file may need to be
twea
Hi-
I'm working on a generic status_of_proc() function to be provided
by /lib/lsb/init-functions in the lsb-base package.
This bug is:
* http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483285
This function also currently uses /bin/pidof, although eventually, I'd
like at add some improved suppo
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:39:31PM +0200, Tim Stoop wrote:
> Op 2-jul-2008, om 5:54 heeft Steve Langasek het volgende geschreven:
I think it would be better to first fix winbind to use a proper PID
file,
then use code similar to that in the smbd/nmbd case.
>>> I'll spend some time
Op 2-jul-2008, om 5:54 heeft Steve Langasek het volgende geschreven:
I think it would be better to first fix winbind to use a proper PID
file,
then use code similar to that in the smbd/nmbd case.
I'll spend some time today to see if I can fix that. I guess the --
make-pidfile option from star
Op 2-jul-2008, om 5:54 heeft Steve Langasek het volgende geschreven:
There's an example of this already in /etc/init.d/samba.
Ah yes, in testing. Using that version of the init script now for my
development (seems to work as expected for the version in Etch, too).
Perhaps that check is wor
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:34:09AM +0200, Tim Stoop wrote:
>> Note that procps is required for this functionality to work, because of
>> the
>> use of ps. I don't know that a dependency is actually warranted,
>> since this
>> is optional functionality; anyway, procps is Priority: required, so i
Op 30-jun-2008, om 23:14 heeft Steve Langasek het volgende geschreven:
Here comes the criticism ;)
I prefer the term "constructive remarks" ;-)
So the right way to do this is to look at the PID files themselves
first,
check their contents, and verify that those processes are still
running
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:34:17AM +0200, Tim Stoop wrote:
> Op 28-jun-2008, om 15:25 heeft Christian Perrier het volgende
> geschreven:
>> I think you're very welcome to propose a patch. We'll review it
>> (indeed, Steve will criticize it and I'll just look..:-)) and,
>> hopefully, integrate it
Op 30-jun-2008, om 19:44 heeft Christian Perrier het volgende
geschreven:
- the "echo" stuff add extra noise and are not handled by the LSB init
functions. Not sure whether this is wanted. Actually, the important
stuff are return codes... I'd vote to remove these echo lines.
Although I would
> This is my addition to the initscript for samba:
I rewrote it to fit the indentation style we use.
I have no deep advice here, except that:
- the "echo" stuff add extra noise and are not handled by the LSB init
functions. Not sure whether this is wanted. Actually, the important
stuff are ret
Op 28-jun-2008, om 15:25 heeft Christian Perrier het volgende
geschreven:
I think you're very welcome to propose a patch. We'll review it
(indeed, Steve will criticize it and I'll just look..:-)) and,
hopefully, integrate it.
This is my addition to the initscript for samba:
status)
SM
Quoting Tim Stoop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I hope you'll see it from that point of view. If so, I created a
> 'status' function in my own samba init script. If you'd like, I can
> post it here. It's not very good (I'm using pidof...), but it seems
> to work and maybe can be a starting point fo
Hi Steve,
Op 28-jun-2008, om 8:36 heeft Steve Langasek het volgende geschreven:
This is indeed most definitely a wishlist.
Which is of course why I set it to 'wishlist' :)
I don't think this is a reasonable expectation of heartbeat on a
Debian
system and believe this should be regarded as a
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:25:06PM +0200, Tim Stoop wrote:
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.24-6etch10
> Severity: wishlist
> The initscripts for both samba and winbind are not LSB compliant because
> they miss the 'status' option. Please provide the 'status' option in the
> initscripts.
This is i
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch10
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
The initscripts for both samba and winbind are not LSB compliant because
they miss the 'status' option. Please provide the 'status' option in the
initscripts.
In particular I'm running into this problem when trying to create a
S
16 matches
Mail list logo
