El Martes, 8 de Julio de 2008, Mark Hindley escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:35:27AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> > Hello Mark:
> >
> > Thanks for this piece of information. I've tried that new prerelease,
> > but unfortunately is completely unusable for me. Once I run the daemon,
>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:35:27AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
>
> Hello Mark:
>
> Thanks for this piece of information. I've tried that new prerelease, but
> unfortunately is completely unusable for me. Once I run the daemon, and I try
> to do aptitude update at most I have something
El Domingo, 6 de Julio de 2008, Mark Hindley escribió:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:50:09AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> > Package: apt-cacher
> > Version: 1.6.4
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hello:
> >
> > When I start 2 aptitude sessions: one for a real system and one for a
> > chroo
package apt-cacher
tag 487789 pending
thanks
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:50:09AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> Package: apt-cacher
> Version: 1.6.4
> Severity: important
>
> Hello:
>
> When I start 2 aptitude sessions: one for a real system and one for a
> chroot; and they concurrently
package apt-cacher
forwarded 487789 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:50:09AM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> Package: apt-cacher
> Version: 1.6.4
> Severity: important
>
> Hello:
>
> When I start 2 aptitude sessions: one for a real system and one for a
> chroot; and
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 1.6.4
Severity: important
Hello:
When I start 2 aptitude sessions: one for a real system and one for a
chroot; and they concurrently run update and/or upgrade I got this message on
dmesg.
apt-cacher[8117]: segfault at 7f87f70b8e18 ip 7f87f7c37b56 sp 7fff0512244
6 matches
Mail list logo
