Russ Allbery writes:
> I recently did a survey of both licenses already listed in
> common-licenses and ones proposed for common-licenses using a Perl
> script that's now in the debian-policy Git repository. The result was
> that the MPL version 1.1 was used by 654 binary packages in the archive
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes:
> The common-licenses was done (IIRC) to save disk space, so to use such
> criteria, I would count only packages with priority >= standard, or a
> proof that most systems have the verbatim license installed many times).
That's roughly the sort of criteria that we'v
On 10.06.2010 21:45, Russ Allbery wrote:
I recently did a survey of both licenses already listed in common-licenses
and ones proposed for common-licenses using a Perl script that's now in
the debian-policy Git repository. The result was that the MPL version 1.1
was used by 654 binary packages in
Ian Jackson writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#487201: MPL-license"):
>> By pure numbers, that's not a sufficient number of packages to warrant
>> inclusion in common-licenses according to the criteria previously
>> discussed here. (I think it falls short
Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#487201: MPL-license"):
> By pure numbers, that's not a sufficient number of packages to warrant
> inclusion in common-licenses according to the criteria previously
> discussed here. (I think it falls short by hundreds.)
I don't think pure
On 11440 March 1977, Russ Allbery wrote:
> By pure numbers, that's not a sufficient number of packages to warrant
> inclusion in common-licenses according to the criteria previously
> discussed here. (I think it falls short by hundreds.)
>From experience in NEW the MPL is unfortunately used ofte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-07-2008 14:42, Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> By pure numbers, that's not a sufficient number of packages to warrant
> inclusion in common-licenses according to the criteria previously
> discussed here. (I think it falls short by hundreds.)
[...]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:42:12AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (Incidentally, right now the iceweasel package doesn't include the MPL in
> debian/copyright, but instead in a separate file next to debian/copyright,
> which surprised me. That's
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:42:12AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The list of packages with full text of MPL-license:
>
> Thank you for doing this search.
>
> By pure numbers, that's not a sufficient number of packages to warrant
> inclusion i
"Dmitry E. Oboukhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The list of packages with full text of MPL-license:
Thank you for doing this search.
By pure numbers, that's not a sufficient number of packages to warrant
inclusion in common-licenses according to the criteria previously
discussed here. (I thi
MH> > The list of packages with full text of MPL-license:
MH> If you filter out packages from the same source, that leaves:
MH> > agsync: /usr/share/doc/agsync/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
MH> > alexandria: /usr/share/doc/alexandria/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
MH> > iceape: /usr/share/doc/iceape/MPL.gz
MH> > iceowl: /usr/s
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:55:32AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:39:36AM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The list of packages with full text of MPL-license:
>
> If you filter out packages from the same source, that leaves:
>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:39:36AM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The list of packages with full text of MPL-license:
If you filter out packages from the same source, that leaves:
> agsync: /usr/share/doc/agsync/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
> alexandria: /usr/share/doc/alexandria/MPL-1
The list of packages with full text of MPL-license:
agsync: /usr/share/doc/agsync/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
alexandria: /usr/share/doc/alexandria/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
iceape: /usr/share/doc/iceape/MPL.gz
iceape-browser: /usr/share/doc/iceape-browser/MPL.gz
iceape-calendar: /usr/share/doc/iceape-calendar/MPL.gz
ice
reassign 487201 debian-policy
thanks
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Some of packages have contain the full text MPL-license.
> (Ice(weasel|ape|dove), addons...).
> Please, include the file http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.txt
> in
Package: base-files
Severity: wishlist
Some of packages have contain the full text MPL-license.
(Ice(weasel|ape|dove), addons...).
Please, include the file http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.txt
into /usr/share/common-licenses.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
