Attached patch is updated vetsion of the previous one with the fixed
rate calculation (/sys/class/power_supply/*/current_* are in ľA
according to the linux-src/Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
and not in ľW as expected by the original code).
Please note that I don't have any notebook whi
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 02:14:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> The patch is better than nothing, though I don't trust the values it
> reports when on battery. This is what I see when discharging:
I have just found out that vanilla kernel (as I have mentioned in the
original email with the patch) wor
Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> Hey Joey,
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/powertop-1.10>acpi
> > Battery 0: Discharging, 87%, 00:04:51 remaining
> >
> Thanks, I'll have a look on this tomorrow. Please do not NMU.
I attached an NMU diff just because I was testing a NMU when I saw that
the report of t
Hey Joey,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/powertop-1.10>acpi
> Battery 0: Discharging, 87%, 00:04:51 remaining
>
Thanks, I'll have a look on this tomorrow. Please do not NMU.
Thanks in advance
Greetings
Winnie
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The patch is better than nothing, though I don't trust the values it
reports when on battery. This is what I see when discharging:
Power usage (ACPI estimate): 2.4W (23.0 hours)
Obviously, I'm not really that lucky.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/powertop-1.10>acpi
Battery 0: Discharging, 87%, 00:
Package: powertop
Version: 1.10-1
Followup-For: Bug #486873
Hi,
I have exatly the same problem like the one reported in this issue.
After some discussion with battery kernel module it seems that some
batteries don't export energy_now attribute and export only charge_now
value.
Nevertheless energy
6 matches
Mail list logo
