On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 18:58 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I was of the opinion that exim was not supposed to be buildable
> against the (yet) released libdkim, since exim required additionial
> stuff in liblibdkim. - This seems to be the point of the libdkim in
> experimental.
> http://packages.q
On 2008-06-16 Russell Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: exim4
> Version: 4.69-5
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> When dkim is added to EDITME the source does not compile
> with the current libdkim in testing (1.0.19). Part of the
> reason is the name of a couple of fields changed i
Package: exim4
Version: 4.69-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
When dkim is added to EDITME the source does not compile
with the current libdkim in testing (1.0.19). Part of the
reason is the name of a couple of fields changed in
libdkim-1.0.19. I presume the change is permanent.
The attached pa
3 matches
Mail list logo