Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>> Why not? That is precisely what /srv is for.
>
> The structure of /srv/ is defined by the local administrator, not by the
> distribution. See FHS and Lintian[1]. note that Lintian detects 0
> package with dir-or-file-in-srv.
i see no reason to re-repeat what i've already
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 20:36 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Frank Lin PIAT [2009.10.26.1726 +0100]:
> > > fwiw, using /srv/tftp as tftp server root directory is FHS conformant.
> >
> > I don't agree, but...
>
> Why not? That is precisely what /srv is for.
The structure of /srv/ is d
also sprach Frank Lin PIAT [2009.10.26.1726 +0100]:
> > fwiw, using /srv/tftp as tftp server root directory is FHS conformant.
>
> I don't agree, but...
Why not? That is precisely what /srv is for.
> > tftpd and tftpd-hpa default for this in unstable now, leaving aftpd
> > being the only one mi
Hello Daniel, Russ, et al.
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 21:49 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> > tftpd-hpa will change the default location of the tftpd folder
>
> s/will change/has changed/
>
> > There was already some discussion on this topic. Would it be possible to
> > define
Bill Allombert wrote:
> I suppose someone need to draft a policy change and submit it.
what's wrong with the text from franklin in the beginning of this very bug?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 05:04:15PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > everybody seems to agree that we agree.. what now?
>
> atftpd mainainer replied some days ago to the bug i opened against the
> atftpd that next upload will change server root to /srv/tftp as well
> which m
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> everybody seems to agree that we agree.. what now?
atftpd mainainer replied some days ago to the bug i opened against the
atftpd that next upload will change server root to /srv/tftp as well
which means all tftpd daemons in debian will be using /srv/tftp.
what now?
--
Ad
everybody seems to agree that we agree.. what now?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:50:27PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Baumann writes:
> > Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>
> >> There was already some discussion on this topic. Would it be possible
> >> to define the location in the policy? See bug #485559
>
> > fwiw, using /srv/tftp as tftp server roo
Russ Allbery wrote:
>> fwiw, using /srv/tftp as tftp server root directory is FHS conformant.
>
> However, installing anything in that directory would not be
of course.
> so I'm not sure that it solves the problem originally expressed in the Policy
> bug
> around this. It would be nice to know
Daniel Baumann writes:
> Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>> There was already some discussion on this topic. Would it be possible
>> to define the location in the policy? See bug #485559
> fwiw, using /srv/tftp as tftp server root directory is FHS conformant.
However, installing anything in that directo
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> tftpd-hpa will change the default location of the tftpd folder
s/will change/has changed/
> There was already some discussion on this topic. Would it be possible to
> define the location in the policy?
> See bug #485559
fwiw, using /srv/tftp as tftp server root directory
Hello,
tftpd-hpa will change the default location of the tftpd folder
from /var/lib/tftpboot to /srv/tftp (see #537656).
There was already some discussion on this topic. Would it be possible to
define the location in the policy?
See bug #485559
Thanks in advance,
Franklin
--
To UNSUBSCRI
13 matches
Mail list logo
