Bug#482415: Bug#483949: xulrunner crash

2008-06-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 05:20:47PM +0300, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd prefer to have confirmation from everyone reporting this bug that it > > is indeed fixed. > > I confirm that xulrunner-1.9 from unstable works with xulmine on armel, > thanks. I'll try to squeeze some time to

Bug#482415: Bug#483949: xulrunner crash

2008-06-12 Thread Riku Voipio
> I'd prefer to have confirmation from everyone reporting this bug that it > is indeed fixed. I confirm that xulrunner-1.9 from unstable works with xulmine on armel, thanks. I'll try to squeeze some time to build Iceweasel with patch from #474281, but it might take till the weekend. -- "rm -rf"

Bug#483949: xulrunner crash

2008-06-07 Thread Martin Guy
On 6/7/08, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The strange thing is that #482415 was originally reported on amd64, > where such alignment problems shouldn't have any effect. 482415 is something different, giving immediate failure on startup with a message. It was filed against iceweasel-3.0

Bug#483949: xulrunner crash

2008-06-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 02:58:52PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > Martin Guy's xulrunner built with his patch at 483949 seems to work > fine. Thanks for tracking this down! > > Josh, you might want to try applying the patch and building > xulrunner on powerpc to see if it fixes the crash there too.

Bug#483949: xulrunner crash

2008-06-07 Thread Riku Voipio
Martin Guy's xulrunner built with his patch at 483949 seems to work fine. Thanks for tracking this down! Josh, you might want to try applying the patch and building xulrunner on powerpc to see if it fixes the crash there too. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNS