On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> there is a contradiction how to name man pages for perl modules.
>> Section 4.1 states
>>
>> Module packages must install manual pages into the standard
>> directories (
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do people feel like that policy is correct and the programs that aren't
> following it are just bugs? (Except for dh-make-perl and other things
> that aren't modules.)
Seems so, although doesn't seem like very important bu
"\"Martín" Ferrari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure, however, that the .1p recommendation is followed. Perl
>> folks, could you check? Is that really current policy and are we
>> following it?
> It seems that
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure, however, that the .1p recommendation is followed. Perl
> folks, could you check? Is that really current policy and are we
> following it?
It seems that we're almost OK there, sorry for the ugly oneliner:
$
Ansgar Burchardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.7.3.0
> Severity: normal
>
> there is a contradiction how to name man pages for perl modules.
> Section 4.1 states
>
> Module packages must install manual pages into the standard
> directories (see Documenta
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.3.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
there is a contradiction how to name man pages for perl modules.
Section 4.1 states
Module packages must install manual pages into the standard
directories (see Documentation, Section 2.4) using the extensions
.1p and .3pm
6 matches
Mail list logo
