Bug#483268: ghostscript does not report the correct bounding box

2011-02-25 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 483268 + moreinfo quit Hi, Two years ago, Jeff Kenvin wrote: > gs -sDEVICE=bbox -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH fname.ps > > Returns a bounding box that is too small, > > I have tried this on the K7 kernel and the amd64 kernel. > Both have the same error. > > The cygwin version of ghostscript does not ha

Bug#483268: ghostscript does not report the correct bounding box

2008-12-07 Thread Mark T.B. Carroll
For what it's worth, I have sometimes found that when gs -sDEVICE=bbox -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH reports a too-small bounding box, ps2epsi still gets it right. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#483268: ghostscript does not report the correct bounding box

2008-05-27 Thread Jeff Kenvin
Subject: ghostscript does not report the correct bounding box Package: ghostscript Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-2.1 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** gs -sDEVICE=bbox -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH fname.ps Returns a bounding box that is too small, I have tried this on the K7 kernel a