* Thibaut VARENE:
> I'm not sure I understand this correctly though: what's needed right
> now is a debian-packaged etch-supported kernel (ie, 2.6.18 if my memory
> serves me right?) that works on hppa? Is it any different that the
> kernel package shipped with etch? (I suspect it is since the lat
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 01:05:49AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > > The developer machines have been unavailable for months, so Debian
> > > developers who don't have their own hppa machine are unable to work on
> > > their own packages or fix bugs.
> >
> > We had some machines setup and running l
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 01:17:06AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> that's fine. in this case we should drop support for hppa for lenny.
> >
> > Probabl
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> that's fine. in this case we should drop support for hppa for lenny.
>
> Probably a good idea. I don't think anyone's doing much work with hppa
> and Deb
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that's fine. in this case we should drop support for hppa for lenny.
Probably a good idea. I don't think anyone's doing much work with hppa
and Debian any more.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
severity 482921 important
thanks
Hi,
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080526 00:06]:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
> > Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > > Package: glibc
> > > Version: 2.7-11
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > Please build libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages; there is no
>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please build libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages; there is no
>> > package build-depending on libc6-hppa64-dev, but we need these
>> > packages to run the testsuites for binutils and gcc-4.X. Currently
>>
clone 482902 -1
reassign -1 general
severity -1 serious
thanks
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> severity 482902 wishlist
> tag 482902 + upstream
> tag 482902 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > Package: glibc
> > Version: 2.7-11
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Please build libc6-hppa64 a
severity 482902 wishlist
tag 482902 + upstream
tag 482902 + wontfix
thanks
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Package: glibc
> Version: 2.7-11
> Severity: important
>
> Please build libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages; there is no
> package build-depending on libc6-hppa64-dev, but we need these
>
Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-11
Severity: important
Please build libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages; there is no
package build-depending on libc6-hppa64-dev, but we need these
packages to run the testsuites for binutils and gcc-4.X. Currently
these packages are completely untested, although
10 matches
Mail list logo
